Morris Hall, PLLC

Estate Planning Attorneys

MakePayment with multiple options
CALL NOW: 1 (888) 222-1328
  • Home
  • Our Firm
    • About Morris Hall
    • Attorneys
    • Our Team
    • Morris Hall Core Values
    • Communities We Serve
      • Arizona
        • Carefree
        • Flagstaff
        • Mesa
        • Oro Valley
        • Phoenix
        • Prescott
        • Scottsdale
        • Sedona
        • Tucson
    • Career Opportunities
  • Our Services
    • Asset Protection
    • Probate
    • Tax Planning
    • Trusts
    • Trust Administration
    • Wills
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Do I Need an Estate Plan?
    • Elder Law Reports
    • Elder Law Resources
      • Phoenix Elder Law
      • Tucson Elder Law
    • Estate Planning Problems
    • FAQs
    • Probate Resources
      • Probate
      • Flagstaff Probate
      • Phoenix Probate
      • Sedona Probate
      • Tucson Probate
    • Published Books
      • Don’t Go Broke in a Nursing home
      • Tax Free Money for Long-Term Care!
    • Recent Law Changes and Improvements Affecting Arizona
      • Update My Living Trust
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • What to Do When Death Occurs
      • What Not To Do When Someone Dies
      • Who To Contact After A Loved Ones Death
  • Reviews
    • Testimonials
    • Review Us
  • Locations
  • Events
    • Seminars / Webinars
    • Past Webinar Recordings
  • Contact
    • Consultation Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Discounts

Law in the U.S. can be Participatory

January 16, 2018 by Morris Hall, PLLC Leave a Comment

Blog Author: Stephen C. Hartnett, J.D., LL.M. (Tax), Director of Education,
American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, Inc.

In some countries, like a dictatorship or a true monarchy (not a constitutional monarchy such as the United Kingdom), people do not really participate in making the law. The law is handed down by fiat. In the United States, our laws are enacted by our elected representatives. Sometimes, those laws may be viewed as violating the fundamental rights guaranteed to all of us by our Constitution. That’s when the judiciary may be asked to step in to make an impartial determination as to whether the law violates the fundamental rights embodied by our Constitution. In our system, anyone who is truly harmed by a law may challenge its constitutionality. They can do this by challenging the application of the law in court. Here’s a quick story of how one person participated in changing the law in the United States.
Edith Windsor married her longtime partner, Dr. Thea Spyer, in 2007. Later, when Dr. Spyer died in 2009, the estate filed a federal estate tax return, claiming a marital deduction for the assets going to Ms. Windsor, her spouse under New York law. The IRS denied the deduction based on the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which prohibited the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages, even those recognized by a state. The IRS disallowed the marital deduction for assets going to Windsor and claimed, as a result, the estate owed more than $363,000 in federal estate taxes. The estate paid the amount owed and sued for a refund in federal district court, challenging the IRS’ denial of the marital deduction. (Often taxpayers pay a disputed tax and then file suit in federal district court rather than not paying and challenging the amount due in the U.S. Tax Court, which is often viewed as a less favorable venue.) She won at the federal district court. The case was appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals, which affirmed the decision of the district court. Finally, the case ended up at the U.S. Supreme Court, which affirmed the decision of the lower courts.
The U.S. Supreme Court held DOMA was unconstitutional insofar as it denied a benefit (a deduction) to same-sex married couples while granting the same benefit to similarly situated heterosexual couples. Based on the decision in U.S. v. Windsor, same-sex married couples gained equality of treatment under the law by the federal government. The Court did not determine whether same-sex couples had a constitutional right to marry, though they would reach that determination two years later in another case, Obergefell v. Hodges, which built on the Windsor decision.
Ms. Windsor, who demonstrated how an individual in our country can participate in making and shaping the law, died recently. Here is a link to an article in the New York Times about her life and death.

  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Morris Hall, PLLC
Morris Hall, PLLC
Morris Hall, PLLC
Latest posts by Morris Hall, PLLC (see all)
  • What Is a Senior Life Settlement? - January 27, 2023
  • Most Used Estate Planning Documents - January 26, 2023
  • How to Help Older Parents from a Distance - January 24, 2023

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

MH logo

Main Office

7600 N 16th St, Ste 105

Phoenix, AZ 85020

Phone: 602-249-1328

Fax: 602-248-2887

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

For a sample Click Here

Offices

Our law firm proudly serves many areas in Arizona. See all of our locations here.

Our law firm proudly serves the state of Arizona.  See all of our locations here.

Toll Free: 888-222-1328

Mon-Thur: 8:00am – 5:00pm
Fri: 8:00am – 4:00pm

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Instagram

Need an Estate Planning Lawyer in Arizona?

Looking for an estate planning attorney near you? We have office locations in Phoenix, Mesa, Chandler, Scottsdale, West Valley, Carefree, Prescott, Sedona, Flagstaff, Tucson, and Oro Valley in Arizona so please visit us at the location that is closest to you.

  • © 2023 American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, Inc All rights reserved.
  • Disclaimer